Segment
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium2. Sunny Wintermax NW 211 Lowcost
Comparison: Sunny Wintermax NW 211 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Asia (prob. China) (Sunny) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Sunny (1%). The first tyre test of Sunny Wintermax NW 211 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the Wintermax NW 211 and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sunny Wintermax NW 211
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Sunny Wintermax NW 211 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4- | 3+ | 2+ | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Sunny Wintermax NW 211 | 40,3 | - | |||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 32,2 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
