Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B rating.
# | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |