Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Sava (67%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Sava TRENTA M+S was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B rating.
# | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |