Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Sava (67%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 also have C wet ratings.
# | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |