Segment
1. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle2. Sava Trenta 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Trenta 2 vs. Nokian cLine VAN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Trenta 2 and Nokian cLine VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Trenta 2 and the cLine VAN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Sava Trenta 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian cLine VAN has A rating.
| # | Sava Trenta 2
| Nokian cLine VAN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Worst position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Sava Trenta 2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 2,1 | |
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
