Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
# | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Both the
Sava Intensa UHP 2 and the Michelin Primacy 4 are summer tyres. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 is a successor to the Sava Intensa UHP and has a rating of 67%. On the other hand, the Michelin Primacy 4, made in ES, DE, PL, is an upgrade from the Michelin Primacy 3 and has earned an impressive 82% rating.
In the Promobil test, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 ranked 8th out of 8 tyres. However, it excelled in Aquaplaning, exhibiting good safety reserves, stable dry handling, short wet and dry braking distances, and good comfort. The tyre's downside includes its limited mileage, which is a factor to consider if you're planning long distance travels.
In the Autobild test, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 landed the 15th spot out of 51 tyres, showcasing again its strengths in Aquaplaning security and handling on dry conditions. Conversely, among 51 tyres, the Michelin Primacy 4 secured the 8th spot, notably for its dry handling and comfort attributes. The Michelin Primacy 4 also left a strong impression with its superior handling qualities, crisp steering, good Aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, very high mileage, and low rolling resistance. Its high price level, however, may deter potential buyers.
The ADAC test placed the Sava Intensa UHP 2 in the 12th spot among 17 tyres, where it was praised for its low noise levels. The Michelin Primacy 4 elevated to the 5th spot for its features, especially in dry braking, safety, and mileage.
In summary, both Sava and Michelin tyres offer certain advantages. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 provides a stable and comfortable ride with admirable safety features, although its limited mileage may be a concern for long haul drivers. The Michelin Primacy 4 boasts top-notch dry handling and braking capacities and is known for its safety and high mileage, but its relatively high price can be off-putting. Note that the Michelin Primacy 4 has been replaced by the Michelin Primacy 4+, offering further enhancements.
Based on the overall comparison and ratings, it seems that the Michelin Primacy 4 could be the preferred choice among consumers seeking value for long-term use, despite its higher price range.
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | |||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 7,3 | 8,0 | 8,4 | |||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 8,8 | 9,1 | 10 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | |||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 1- | 1- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
Michelin Primacy 4 | 36,2 | 29,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | ||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | ||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 1,5 | ||
Show test details |