Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Sava (67%). The first tyre test of Sava Intensa HP was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Intensa HP and the Roadhawk were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Sava Intensa HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.
| # | Sava Intensa HP
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP | 37,7 | 40,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
