Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Sailun (59%). In this particular case, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 has a better rating of 66% compared to 58% of the Falken Azenis FK510. The first tyre test of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
