Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
Comparison: Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Rotalla (63%). The first tyre test of Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Multiseason 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Setula 4 Season RA03 and the Multiseason 2 were tested.
| # | Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
| Firestone Multiseason 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 42,9 | 59,4 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41,2 | 49,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
