Segment
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
Comparison: Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Rotalla allround tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Falken (65%). The first tyre test of Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Setula 4 Season RA03 and the EuroALL Season AS210 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 42,9 | 59,4 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,7 | 51,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 43,3 | 55,5 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 44,2 | 50,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
