Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Radar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Radar winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 48% of the Radar Dimax Alpine. The first tyre test of Radar Dimax Alpine was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Dimax Alpine and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Radar Dimax Alpine
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Radar Dimax Alpine | 39.9 | 28.9 | |||||
Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Radar Dimax Alpine | 36,8 | 30,6 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Radar Dimax Alpine | 38,1 | ||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
Show test details |