Segment
1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Premium2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Sava (62%). The first tyre test of Pirelli Scorpion Winter was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Scorpion Winter and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Pirelli Scorpion Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating.
# | Pirelli Scorpion Winter
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Premium2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.93
1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Exemplary2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Pirelli Scorpion Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,8 |
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Show test details |