• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

# Pirelli P ZERO
/0%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
/68%

Add to comparison

Pirelli
Kumho
DimensionsR17 - R22 R16 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

When it comes to a comparison of two significant summer tyres, Pirelli P ZERO and Kumho Ecsta PS71 are exceptional choices. Both being tested in various conditions, let's delve into their performance and see how they fared.


The Pirelli P ZERO is crafted in Italy, and it achieved an overall rating of 61% in our tests. Its notable strengths lie in dry handling, making them ideal for summer days. In the Autobild test, P ZERO secured the 4th place among 53 competitors. It also stood out in the ADAC test, showing impressive traits such as dry braking, dry driving behavior, safety, exterior noise, wet circle cornering, and particularly wet handling where it bagged the 12th spot out of 16. However, it lost some points for lack of any newer tyre replacing this model.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71, delivered a higher performance with an overall rating of 77%. One distinguishing feature of this tyre is its excellent handling of aquaplaning situations, both cross and longitudal, which gave it an edge in both ADAC and ACE tests. The Ecsta PS71 is not only superlative in handling wet conditions but it also handles dry conditions well, as suggested by securing the 2nd position in ACE's test among 11 rivals. On the downside, its place of manufacture is not clearly stated but its first-rate performance contributes significantly to its high rating.


In mutual tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally outranks the Pirelli P ZERO and hence, emerges as a customer-preferred choice. However, it's worth noting that Pirelli P ZERO offers superior dry handling that could suit certain driving conditions and preferences.


To summarize, while both the tyres demonstrate commendable performance, it's the Kumho Ecsta PS71 that takes the lead, thanks to its higher average user rating and its excellent handling of different weather conditions, thereby providing a reliable driving experience.


The decision rests on individual preference, specific driving conditions, and the importance placed on performance testing results. Visit the website of each tyre's manufacturer, Pirelli and Kumho, for more specifics about these two summer tyre choices.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,128,7
Pirelli P ZERO34,834,6
Kumho Ecsta PS7134,929
Show test details
ADAC
Name RatingWetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdobré1,71,32,82,01,6
Pirelli P ZERO
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé1,81,3 2,93,02,7
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2,32,43,33,02,0
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné111
Pirelli P ZERO
Rating: Good
dobré1-2+3+
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé22-3-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,228,7
Pirelli P ZERO35,128,9
Kumho Ecsta PS7137,131,6
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalRatingWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test150doporučeno5539147
Pirelli P ZERO
Rating: Recommended
141doporučeno 5850168
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Rating: Recommended
149doporučeno 674414 9
Show test details