Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (61%). But when it comes to comparing Pirelli CARRIER WINTER and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the CARRIER WINTER and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 58% of Pirelli CARRIER WINTER dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Kumho PorTran CW51 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Rating: Recommended | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,7 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
