Segment
1. Norauto Prevensys 4 Lowcost2. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Norauto Prevensys 4 vs. Westlake Z-107
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Norauto) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake). Generally, Norauto summer tyres are slightly better rated (49%) than Westlake (22%). In this particular case, the Norauto Prevensys 4 has a better rating of 49% compared to 3% of the Westlake Z-107. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Prevensys 4 and the Z-107 were tested.
| # | Norauto Prevensys 4
| Westlake Z-107
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Norauto Prevensys 4 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 3,2 | |||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
