Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 235/45 R18 test, where both the zLine and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.
# | Nokian zLine
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian zLine 75%
2. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
2. Nokian zLine 60%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 93%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 80%
1. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 150 | doporučeno | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | |
Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 149 | doporučeno | 63 | 47 | 18 | 7 | |
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Recommended | 149 | doporučeno | 67 | 44 | 14 | 9 | |
Show test details |