• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2018 225/45 R17 test, where both the zLine and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.

# Nokian zLine
/0%
Continental PremiumContact 6
/83%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Continental
DimensionsR16 - R21 R15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Automotorsport
Name Points totalWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,49,89,310
Nokian zLine7,88,07,39,0
Continental PremiumContact 68,58,58,78,0
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalRatingWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test150doporučeno5539147
Nokian zLine
Rating: Recommended
149doporučeno 6347187
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Recommended
145doporučeno 6348187
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,134,6
Nokian zLine36,140,2
Continental PremiumContact 634,935
Show test details