Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. BFGoodrich Advantage
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than BFGoodrich (40%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 76% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine | BFGoodrich Advantage | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian zLine ? dB