Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine SUV and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the Turanza T001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B rating.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 1- | 1 | |||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||