Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has a better rating of 72% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has B rating. We also know where WR SUV 4 is made - Russian Federation.
# | Nokian WR SUV 4
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 4 | 347 | 107 | 133 | 107 | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | 327 | 83 | 128 | 116 | |||
Show test details |