• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has a better rating of 72% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has B rating. We also know where WR SUV 4 is made - Russian Federation.

# Nokian WR SUV 4
/26%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
/72%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Hankook
DimensionsR16 - R21 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in testpříkladné1-2111
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-2-2+2-2
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
Rating: Good
dobré2+2-2+3+2-
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test386143138118
Nokian WR SUV 4347107133107
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A32783128116
Show test details