Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 44% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
