Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Michelin Alpin A4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D3 and Michelin Alpin A4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the WR D3 and the Alpin A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 56% of Nokian WR D3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Michelin Alpin A4 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR D3
| Michelin Alpin A4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2 | 2- | 1 | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||