Segment
1. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Matador (38%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the WR D3 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 56% of Nokian WR D3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR D3
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
1. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 43,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
