Segment
1. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the WR D3 and the Kristall Montero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 56% of Nokian WR D3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR D3
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
1. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
