Segment
2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Nokian (62%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A has a better rating of 85% compared to 55% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Wetproof SUV | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
