Segment
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WeatherProof vs. Kleber Quadraxer 2
Table of contents:
| # | Nokian WeatherProof
| Kleber Quadraxer 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The following tyre comparison offers an insight between the models Nokian WeatherProof and Kleber Quadraxer 2 from two acclaimed tyre manufacturers, Nokian and Kleber.
Let's start with Nokian Weatherproof, a premium all-round tyre. Its strengths lie with aquaplaning-cross, rolling resistance, snow braking, snow handling, and snow traction. The Nokian WeatherProof tyre scored an impressive overall rating of 59% on our tests. It is manufactured in Finland . However, it's important to note that it does not have previous models nor has it been replaced by a newer model yet.
Second, we have the Kleber Quadraxer 2, an all-round tyre that comes with an overall rating of 33%. It is best known for exterior noise reduction, snow braking, snow cornering, snow handling, and snow traction. Produced in Poland, the Quadraxer 2 has no previous models. Nevertheless, it has been replaced with a newer model, the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
The Autobild test gave the Nokian Weatherproof 9th position out of 27 total tyres tested, while the Kleber Quadraxer 2 obtained 11th position. However, the Autoklub ČR rated the Nokian Weatherproof in second place, but placed Kleber Quadraxer 2 in 5th place, proving the superior performance of Nokian Weatherproof in general.
Moreover, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 was praised for its performance on snow-packed surfaces and noise reduction, alongside its dry braking and cost-effectiveness according to Autobild 2020. However, it was also pointed out that it had limited curve aquaplaning capabilities.
In conclusion, both tyres are commendable in their own rights with each having specific strong points. If you are looking for excellence in aquaplaning-cross and rolling resistance, opt for the Nokian WeatherProof. On the other hand, if cost-effectiveness and noise reduction matter more to you, you might want to consider the Kleber Quadraxer 2 or its successor, the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.63
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 45,2 | 51,6 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 43,2 | 51,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 44,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 44,2 | 50,7 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 45,1 | 52 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100,6 | 100 | 102,2 | |
| Nokian WeatherProof | 97,9 | 98,4 | 96,1 | 99,3 | 98,3 | 101,2 | |
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 95,6 | 91,9 | 95,6 | 99,4 | 86,4 | 101,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||