Segment
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Upper-middle
# | Nokian WeatherProof
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we will be comparing two impressive all-season tyres: the Nokian WeatherProof and the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2. Both made by respected manufacturers, Nokian and BFGoodrich, these tyres have been put to the test in various performance aspects.
For the Nokian WeatherProof, which was made in Finland, it secured a rating of 59% on our scale. Notably, in the AutoBild test, it was ranked 9th out of 27 tyres. Its key strengths were its performance in Aquaplaning - cross, Rolling resistance, Snow braking, Snow handling, and Snow traction. The unique amenities of this tyre lie in its exceptional handling during harsh winter conditions. Moreover, with an excellent performance in rolling resistance, it reduces fuel consumption, offering a cost-effective drive to users.
On the other hand, the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2, received a lower rating of 48% on our scale. In the same AutoBild test, this tyre secured the 14th position. However, it outshone in aspects like Exterior noise, Comfort, Snow braking, Snow cornering, and Snow handling. Specifically, its biggest advantages are the exceptional comfort it provides to drivers and its performance capabilities in snowy conditions. Moreover, the tyre is quiet when driving, providing a peaceful ride experience.
Moreover, if we look at the data from the Autozeitung test, the ranking dynamic changes. The BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 stood in 3rd position, surpassing the Nokian WeatherProof that stood in 4th place, out of 10 tested tyres. This further confirms the versatility and allrounder characteristic of both the tyres.
However, it's also significant to note the weaknesses that were observed during the tests. For the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2, some issues were observed with understeering on wet tracks, affecting its driving safety in such conditions. Conversely, the Nokian WeatherProof tyre showed no such notable weaknesses during the tests.
In conclusion, it is clear that both tyres display specific strengths. If you seek affordability and winter weather strength along with lower rolling resistance for fuel efficiency, the Nokian WeatherProof tyre is might be a good fit for you. Conversely, if factors like comfort, less exterior noise, and competent snow handling are your priorities, you might want to consider the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2. However, both tyres prove to be high performers with bullish results in the all-season category.
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Upper-middle
1. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Highly recommended2. Nokian WeatherProof Good +
2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 45,2 | 51,6 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 43,1 | 51 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 44,6 | 54,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 44,2 | 50,7 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 44,8 | 52,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 358 | vítěz testu | 124 | 138 | 134 | ||
Nokian WeatherProof Rating: Ok | 337 | ok | 95 | 108 | 134 | ||
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 345 | velmi doporučeno | 111 | 123 | 111 | ||
Show test details |