Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Snowproof 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Nokian Snowproof 2 has a better rating of 71% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowproof 2 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 | 40.0 | 30.5 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||