Segment
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 has a better rating of 97% compared to 71% of the Nokian Snowproof 2. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowproof 2 and the UltraGrip Performance 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Nokian Snowproof 2
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended
Name | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Nokian Snowproof 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Nokian Snowproof 2 | 40.0 | 30.5 | |||||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | 36.9 | 29.4 | |||||
Show test details |