Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof 1 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof 1 was done in 2024, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Seasonproof 1 and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof 1
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Nokian Seasonproof 1 | 41.2 | 60.1 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41.5 | 55.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
