Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will compare two popular summer tyres: Nokian Powerproof and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti. Both tyres have been tested by various organizations, and we will summarize their performance based on the data from these tests. Our goal is to give you an informed decision on which tyre is more suitable for your needs.
The Nokian Powerproof is a summer tyre manufactured by the Finnish company Nokian. It has a rating of 85% on our website. This tyre is known for its excellent performance in wet conditions, particularly in wet braking. In the Autobild test, it ranked 7th out of 11 tyres and performed exceptionally well in wet braking. In the ADAC test, it ranked 11th out of 16 tyres, with its best features being low noise and interior noise. In the Gute-Fahrt test, it ranked 4th out of 10 tyres.
On the other hand, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is a summer tyre produced by the Dutch company Vredestein. It has a higher rating of 87% on our website. This tyre offers excellent performance in various conditions, particularly in wet handling and dry handling. In the Autobild test, it ranked 5th out of 11 tyres and performed exceptionally well in aquaplaning (cross), wet braking, wet handling, and wet side guide. In the ADAC test, it ranked 7th out of 16 tyres, with its best features being mileage and exterior noise. In the Gute-Fahrt test, it ranked 10th out of 10 tyres, with its best performance in wet braking.
Comparing the two tyres' performance in mutual tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti outperformed the Nokian Powerproof in the Autobild and ADAC tests, while the Nokian Powerproof ranked higher in the Gute-Fahrt test.
Strengths and Weaknesses
The Nokian Powerproof's main strengths are its excellent wet braking ability and low noise levels. However, it falls short in some other aspects, such as overall performance in the ADAC test.
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti excels in wet handling, dry handling, and mileage. Its weaknesses are not as apparent as the Nokian Powerproof, but it ranked last in the Gute-Fahrt test, which could be a concern for some drivers.
Verdict
Both the Nokian Powerproof and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti are strong summer tyre choices with high ratings on our website. The Nokian Powerproof might be a better choice if you prioritize wet braking performance and lower noise levels. However, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti offers a more balanced performance in various conditions and may be preferable if you require wet handling, dry handling, and better mileage.
In conclusion, your choice between the Nokian Powerproof and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti will depend on your priorities and driving needs. Both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, and we encourage you to consider these factors when making your decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
