• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 1 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 76% compared to 62% of the Nokian Powerproof 1. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 1 was done in 2025, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof 1 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 1 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof 1 is made - Finland.

# Nokian Powerproof 1
/62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
/76%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Kumho
DimensionsR17 - R20 R16 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,61,5
Nokian Powerproof 1
Rating: Satisfactory
2,53,3
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Rating: Satisfactory
3,02,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32.627.4
Nokian Powerproof 134.830.4
Kumho Ecsta PS7134.227.4
Show test details