Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof 1 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 76% compared to 62% of the Nokian Powerproof 1. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 1 was done in 2025, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof 1 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 1 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof 1 is made - Finland.
# | Nokian Powerproof 1
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Powerproof 1 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Nokian Powerproof 1 Satisfactory
1. Nokian Powerproof 1 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof 1 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 3,3 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof 1 | 34.8 | 30.4 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
Show test details |