Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Pirelli P ZERO
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line and Pirelli P ZERO, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli P ZERO first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line has A wet grip rating, whereas 53% of Pirelli P ZERO has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and P ZERO is made in Italy.
| # | Nokian Line
| Pirelli P ZERO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Pirelli P ZERO 6.062. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Pirelli P ZERO Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Dry steering response
2. Nokian Line 60%
Dry driving behavior
2. Nokian Line 74%
Dry lane changing
1. Nokian Line 85%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
