Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Nokian Powerproof
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and Powerproof is made in Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Dry steering response
2. Nokian Line 60%
Dry lane changing
2. Nokian Line 85%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
