Segment
1. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian cLine VAN vs. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (62%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian cLine VAN and Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the cLine VAN and the Vansmart MCV3+ were tested.
| # | Nokian cLine VAN
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
