Segment
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Matador (38%). In this particular case, the Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 has a better rating of 60% compared to 38% of the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow. The first tyre test of Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 was done in 2020, compared to 2015 when was the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winguard Snow G3 WH21 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested.
| # | Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | 35,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||