Segment
1. Continental UltraContact Premium2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N Fera Primus vs. Continental UltraContact
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nexen (61%). The first tyre test of Nexen N Fera Primus was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Continental UltraContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the N Fera Primus and the UltraContact were tested.
| # | Nexen N Fera Primus
| Continental UltraContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R55 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | dobré | 3,1 | 2,3 | ||||
| Continental UltraContact Rating: Good | dobré | 1,7 | 2,6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||