Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has a better rating of 93% compared to 85% of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 235/55 R19 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 SUV and the Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Pilot Sport 4 SUV is made in Poland/Spain and Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A is made in Korea.
# | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R23 | R17 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary
2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Recommended
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |