Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Falken (70%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has a better rating of 96% compared to 75% of the Falken Azenis FK520. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 SUV and the Azenis FK520 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Pilot Sport 4 SUV is made in Poland/Spain and Azenis FK520 is made in Turkey.
# | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R23 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Very good | |||||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Show test details |