• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Falken Azenis FK510

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Falken (59%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 91% compared to 74% of the Falken Azenis FK510. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 S and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Pilot Sport 4 S is made in United States and Azenis FK510 is made in Japan/Turkey.

# Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
/91%
Falken Azenis FK510
/74%

Add to comparison

Michelin
Falken
DimensionsR18 - R23 R17 - R99
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDry
Best values in test11-
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Rating: Exemplary
2+1-
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,15,75,76,3
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Rating: Very good
9,1 8,89,58
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Very good
8,19,27,57,3
Show test details
Name WetDry
Best values in test2+1-
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Rating: Exemplary
2+ 1-
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Satisfactory
1-2-
Show test details
Name WetDry
Best values in test2+1-
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Rating: Exemplary
22+
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Good
1-2-
Show test details
Name
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Rating: -
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Recommended
Show test details