Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than GoodYear (86%). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the Pilot Alpin PA4 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating.
# | Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Show test details |