Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
Comparison: Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Michelin (91%). In this particular case, the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV has a better rating of 96% compared to 88% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005. The first tyre test of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2023 235/60 R18 test, where both the PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R23 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry steering response
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Outstanding | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 63 | 64 | 43 | 18 | 8 | ||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV Rating: Recommended | 63 | 57 | 42 | 17 | 7 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 60 | 64 | 41 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 384 | 130 | 136 | 118 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 386 | 143 | 136 | 107 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
