Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Hankook (71%). The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Tour HP was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Latitude Tour HP and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A rating.
# | Michelin Latitude Tour HP
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 124 | podmíněně doporučeno | 53 | 37 | 15 | 8 | |
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | doporučeno | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | |
Show test details |