Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate SUV vs. Nokian Weatherproof SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Weatherproof SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the Weatherproof SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A rating.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||