Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate SUV vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Michelin (83%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A has a better rating of 93% compared to 80% of the Michelin CrossClimate SUV. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R18 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||