Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Hankook (77%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A has a better rating of 88% compared to 80% of the Michelin CrossClimate SUV. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R18 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |