Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate SUV vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate SUV has a better rating of 80% compared to 79% of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
