Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Continental (74%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact has a better rating of 83% compared to 80% of the Michelin CrossClimate SUV. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the AllSeasonContact were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (99%) of the Continental AllSeasonContact also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |