Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Alpin 5 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Alpin 5 and the Blizzak LM-001 EVO were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Alpin 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Alpin 5
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Michelin Alpin 5 100%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2- | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 2,4 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | 34,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
