Segment
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs. Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Yokohama (35%). In this particular case, the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate has a better rating of 76% compared to 47% of the Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/75 R16 test, where both the Agilis CrossClimate and the Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 were tested.
| # | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
| Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Test winner2. Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Recommended2. Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
