Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Falken (44%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin AGILIS ALPIN and Falken EuroWinter VAN01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Falken EuroWinter VAN01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the EuroWinter VAN01 were tested.
# | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Falken EuroWinter VAN01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,3 | 3,2 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Show test details |